Crazy, Cuckoo Capital Punishment
Blogger 1:
I cannot believe that in some countries they still have the death penalty!
This is not the Middle Ages anymore; we should not condone the murder of each
other as that is just encouraging violence. Do they not understand how barbaric
that appears to other nations? Even in a developed country like America, some
states still have the death penalty; in 2012 there were 43 executions and 77
death penalties in America. These are absolutely horrifying figures! If these
figures are not enough to terrify you, other countries are far, far,
far worse.
For example, in Iran there were at least 314 executions in 2012 and at least 79
death sentences. I would hate to live in a country where some live in fear of
death. It is
not right. It must be stopped.
http://www.amnestyusa.org/our-work/campaigns/abolish-the-death-penalty?id=1011005
Blogger 2:
Why would you hate to live in a country with the death penalty? Surely it
would make you feel safer knowing that the criminals couldn't commit another
crime if they're dead? The only criminals that are executed are the ones that
have killed people and I believe they deserve to die after doing something so
unforgivable as that. They are malicious, malevolent monsters. Haven't you ever
heard of the phrase 'let the punishment fit the crime' or 'an eye for an eye'?
If a murderer serves his time in prison and is then let out, they then have the
opportunity to kill again. For example, Kenneth Allen McDuff was an American
serial killer who was imprisoned for killing people and then killed more people
after being let out of prison. More people could have been saved than killed if
McDuff was executed. Innocent lives were wasted. Would you like to be responsible
of innocent people dying if you help get rid of the death penalty?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kenneth_McDuff
Blogger 1:
I can understand your thirst for vengeance for the victims of the heart
breaking crime that is murder. However, how can you be completely sure that the
person you are executing is
actually guilty? What happens if you seem
to have all the evidence in the world that points to a person being guilty of
murder but it turns out they were cleverly set up? Would
you like to
be responsible of an innocent person dying if you did not help get rid of the
death penalty? Furthermore, it is against the law in America to execute someone
if they are mentally insane. However, it is estimated that 5-10% of prisoners
on death row in America have severe mental illnesses. Consequently, it should
unconstitutional to kill them as they were not aware of right or wrong at the
time or of the consequences their actions would have. Therefore, the death
penalty is killing people who do not deserve to die and needs to be stopped.
Now.
http://www.deathpenalty.org/article.php?id=53
Blogger 2:
Life is precious and needs to be protected. Innocent people don't deserve to
have that gift taken away from them and the perpetrators should be punished
severely. Losing a loved one is an awful event but it's even worse if it was
intentional and with malice. In my opinion, the execution of the murderer gives
the victim's friends and family the closure they need to grieve in peace. Also,
the death penalty is less expensive than life in prison and also decreases the
prison population. This means that taxpayers pay less of their own money
looking after criminals. Why should innocent people have to pay to look after
evil murderers when they could be using the money to look after themselves and
their family?
Blogger 1:
If someone killed another person in cold blood and it was premeditated then
that would be murder. However, is this not a
definition of the death
penalty? You set a date to kill someone and the executioner does not feel too
much remorse as the person 'deserves it'. How sociopathic can a society get if
they condone this? Also, if they serve life in prison then they would
definitely have had enough of punishment and would not want to do something to
serve time again. Furthermore, it is a common belief that people can learn from
their mistakes and change for the better. Why could this not be possible for
killers? For example, in 1979 Stanley Williams was sentenced to death after
being convicted of four murders. He was the co-founder of a violent and
powerful gang in Los Angeles called Crisps who were responsible for hundreds of
murders. However, about five years later, Williams underwent a religious
conversion and consequently wrote many books and created many programs which
encouraged peace and fought against gang violence. He was nominated for the
Nobel Literature Prize four times and the Nobel Peace Prize five times. This
proves that convicts can turn away from lives of violence and become new
people. Despite the fact that Mr Williams was no longer dangerous for society,
he was still executed in 2005. Can you see how numerous people could view this punishment
as morally
wrong? There is no black and white case for capital
punishment. The majority of prisoners on death row have been either physically
or sexually abused in their lives. This would obviously play a big part in
their lack of morals. However, if they were given therapy and were taught how
to function properly in society, why could they not be given a second chance?
Mr Williams gave so much good to society after he acquired new morals and if it
were not for the death penalty he could have contributed so much more. Capital
punishment is immoral, ignorant and
inhumane. Help us stop it.
A really well-researched, thoughtful and well-developed piece. The reason you may be having problems differentiating the voices is that they don't have clear identities - what signs can you add in about how old they are (sociolect), where they come from (dialect), what their interest in the topic is other than just academic (emotive language that comes from experience) etc? You could actually introduce a third voice that is more of a troll to add some flaming and create a very different voice that perhaps uses some non-standard English.
ReplyDelete